Credit reporting Atlanta

He found about the Pricelessware Huntersoft Alert page reporting that UDI is a ripped version of UKD. He says that Huntersoft (which had an article about him back in 2002, I will try to find that) stated my program was part of a Linux project credit reporting Atlanta and was Open Source. Why a windows only program would be part of a linux project I have no clue. Looking at their webpage I don't see any references to any projects they themselves run. I tried to contact them but they have a spam filter that blocks my email server and my isp's netblock.

I was unable credit reporting Atlanta to even contact the people who created the blackhole list. According to the emails Huntersoft claims the program is GPL not Open Source.

Either way my program is neither GPL nor Open Source, at least currently.

But if the program were GPL you would find that there are several requirements you need to do, some of them quoted below: To sum up, if you want to credit reporting Atlanta change a GPL program you must provided credit reporting Atlanta complete source code with your program, credit reporting Atlanta including pointing out all changes you have done to it's source code, keep all copyright notices. So even if credit reporting Atlanta my program were under GPL his program would be in violation of that license too. check credit scores Continuing with the article it moves on to how lots of programs credit reporting Atlanta take ideas from others. It uses the examples of Windows taking from Mac (credit reporting Atlanta who took it from Xerox), and Internet Explorer from Netscape Navigator (who took it from Mosaic). They didn't just take the basic idea of a "program that looks at the device manager and look up devices in a list to know what it is" but instead took the complete program, removed my name and put in his and did the same with my webpage. This credit reporting Atlanta would be the same as if Microsoft did this: And after Netscape complained they created a new improved version (and hid a trojan in it too) UKD 1.2 and UDI 1.60: UKD 1.2 Main Window: UDI 3.01 Main Window: If Huntersoft used the basic idea I would have no problems with it.

There are lots of credit reporting Atlanta programs that look up devices in some sort of list including windows itself (using .inf's as lists). credit reports and scores

The original UDI is identical to mine, even the same bugs. After that version he did other stuff like put in a different title bar, an odd waiting bar and different menus in attempt to call if different. Huntersoft didn't credit reporting Atlanta copy concepts, they ripped me off. The article then moves on to a story credit reporting Atlanta about some schoolmates that started a software company creating Video Frequency Broadcasting software. This company went out of business due credit reporting Atlanta to lack of market. Later on this person found out that another company wrote a program that was very much the same as the program they created.

He learned that one of his credit reporting Atlanta friends works at that company. Before the original company disbanded they all signed credit reporting Atlanta a "security agreement" (security agreement? I assume credit reporting Atlanta it's some cultural/legal differences there). The new company states that they did not break the agreement because the code is now in VC++ (Microsoft Visual C++) instead of (Borland) Delphi. To me credit reporting Atlanta it sounds like they wrote up credit reporting Atlanta a bad agreement. oregon free credit report Just because someone translates a book from English to French doesn't mean you lose the copyright on it. It then moves on to how copycat software is very common in China and that this is helping the software become better.

As I know very well how much better UDI is after trying to wipe out Windows. It also goes on to talk with a lawyer about copyright law. He credit reporting Atlanta says that if the program has a very original design it might be protected as fine arts but otherwise nothing.

To me that means they have no copyright laws there, I'm not surprised.